RE: Proper way to die...

["Wilt, Charles" <CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rich,

I'm wondering if having a PSSR subroutine would make a difference.  You could 
send the message to * and 1, which would be the program/procedure that invoked 
die.  Since die isn't monitored, the PSSR would be invoked.

Just thinking out loud ;-)

Charles Wilt
iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America
ph: 513-573-4343
fax: 513-398-1121
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Rich Duzenbury
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 3:04 PM
> To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Proper way to die...
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 13:39 -0600, Christen, Duane J. wrote:
> > What you want to do is leave the call stack entry at '*' 
> (current call stack
> > entry) and change the call stack count to 1 (previous x 
> entries). This will
> > send the message to the caller of die.
> > 
> Duane, thanks for the suggestion.
> 
> I gave it a try, and I still receive RNQ0202, Inquiry, sev 99
> "The call to 'DIE' ended in error".
> 
> Perhaps one cannot effectively have a 'die' procedure, and 
> must instead
> code all of the QMHSNDPM calls inline of the procedure that 
> is failing?
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Rich
>