|
I started a different thread as the topic has changed somewhat. Based on the last two posts to the procedure name vs. production support thread and seeing this theme run through the prior posts I'm going to go for the gusto and try to get the approval to combine multiple procedure into a module and, if I understand correctly, multiple modules into a service program. The question I have now is where to draw the line on how to do the general design. First some background. Our applications can be separated into different areas; payments, collections, funding, etc. Should I have a single service program for each application area or would there be more than one per area? I presume one for everything is not a good idea. Even though most of the suggestions from the other thread advocated multiple procedures in a single module I wasn't picking up much on multiple modules in a service program (probably my thick skull) but that seems to make sense. Thoughts? Rick Privileged and Confidential. This e-mail, and any attachments there to, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this e-mail. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.