RE: Prototyped Procedures

["Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yo, Bob!  I figured that out BEFORE I responded.  Your comments were
public, and no matter to whom you directed them, the points were just as
wrong.  And since I use the single member method, any negative comments
regarding the method are fair game for my rebuttal.

There was one valid point which I acknowledged, the rest of the post was
less valid.  In my opinion the analogy was erroneous and the
generalization inaccurate.  I explained my position on each.

Post your opinions, expect rebuttal.

Joe


> From: Bob Cozzi
> 
> Joe,
> As you probably figured out after your wrote this note, most of what
you
> answered was in a note to Rick not to you. So the fact hat you use
WDSc is
> not relevant in your reply to me. And my "sweeping generalization is
as
> inaccurate as your previous" is not applicable. I hope you code more
> accurately than you reply to emails. <tic>
> -Cozzi