|
Traditionally prototypes are saved in a source file named QPROTOSRC. And they would have the same name as the subprocedure or program they are the prototype for. For example D/COPY MYLIB/QCPYSRC,GETGRP_PR becomes D/COPY MYLIB/QPROTOSRC,GETGROUP The advantages to setting up multiple subprocedures in one source member are the same for setting up multiple subroutines in a source member. However, if you are talking about subprocedures you are planning on using in a service program then that's a different story. I suppose a lot of that is style. Some may be because the subprocedures are written in different languages. But whether you: - Keep each subprocedure in it's own source member and in it's own service program. - Keep subprocedures grouped by function (like date, or bill of material, etc) in multiple source members but one service program - Keep subprocedures grouped by function in one source member and one service program - Keep all subprocedures in separate source members, but one service program - Keep all subprocedures in one source member and one service program is largely a matter of style. I will caution you that one monolithic general copy member will drive the anal retentive people who's goal is to not have one unreferenced variable in their program into a foaming at the mouth fit. They will end up chopping out what they need and physically copying in to each desired member. And I am not talking /copy here. If you still want the monolith it's better to - use /include instead of /copy, (but they work the same on V5R3) (imbedded SQL programmers understand the difference between /include and /copy) - and nest the members For example your monolith becomes merely a string of /include statements. Rob Berendt -- Group Dekko Services, LLC Dept 01.073 PO Box 2000 Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com "Ala, Michael A" <michael.ala@xxxxxx> Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 02/01/2005 01:28 PM Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Prototyped Procedures What is the best way to perform Procedure prototyping I would like some rules I am not sure if I am performing any steps that are unecessary This is in the caller D/COPY MYLIB/QCPYSRC,GETGRP_PR This is what is copied in D GetGroup PR 1A EXTPROC('GETGROUP') D $Group 10A D $Cust# 8S 0 CONST OPTIONS(*OMIT) D $Item# 25A OPTIONS(*NOPASS) Here is the call for the Procedure (um Function) EVAL $CustGrp=GETGROUP($Group:CUST#) Here is what is in the called Procedure D/COPY MYLIB/QCPYSRC,GETGRP_PR PGETGROUP B EXPORT D GetGroup PI 1A D $Group 10A D $Cust# 8S 0 CONST OPTIONS(*OMIT) D $Item# 25A OPTIONS(*NOPASS) D $Found S 1A INZ('N') Also what are the advantages to setting up multiple sub-procedures in a single source member What limitations does this have I am always doing things I can't do; that's how I get to do them. -Pablo Picasso -- This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.