|
What's wrong with the Iter and Leave op codes? I've used them a lot in the past, and will probably continue to do so in the future. I don't like the GOTO's and CAB's, but the LEAVE and ITER just make sense. Especially in screen processing. The following code is a looping screen. The ITER code helps when doing validation, and the LEAVE is a simple way to get out. How could you code this without using them? BTW, this isn't my code, but I was looking real quick to find an example lol. * Stay in loop until Cmd 1 is pressed c dow not(*in01) c eval action = *blanks c eval category = *blanks c eval descriptn = *blanks c exfmt cbrdescdt c movea '0000000' *in(30) * * F5 will print report c if *in05 = *on c eval *in50 = *on c exsr print c iter c endif * * Just a little error check to help keep ya in line. c if action = *blanks c eval *in31 = *on c iter c endif * * Add a record to the file c if action = 'A' c category chain crltycdr c if not %found(crltycd) c exsr error_check c if *in32 = *on or c *in33 = *on c iter c endif c eval crlcat = category c eval crldesc = descriptn c write crltycdr c else c eval *in30 = *on c iter c endif c endif * c if action = 'C' c category chain crltycdr c if %found(crltycd) c eval *in35 = *on c exsr get_record c exsr error_check c if *in32 = *on or c *in33 = *on c iter c endif c eval crlcat = category c eval crldesc = descriptn c update crltycdr c else c eval *in34 = *on c iter c endif c endif * c if action = 'D' c category chain crltycdr c if %found(crltycd) c movea '11' *in(35) c exsr get_record c exfmt cbrwindow c if *in12 = *on c iter c endif c delete crltycdr c else c eval *in34 = *on c iter c endif c endif c enddo c eval *inlr = *on Ron Power Programmer Information Services City Of St. John's, NL P.O. Box 908 St. John's, NL A1C 5M2 Tel: 709-576-8132 Email: rpower@xxxxxxxxxx Website: http://www.stjohns.ca/ ___________________________________________________________________________ Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiasm. - Sir Winston Churchill Tony Carolla <carolla@xxxxxxxxx> Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 31/01/2005 01:27 PM Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Re: Suggested technique Hi Alan. Thanks again for the tip. I always grapple with the idea of not using iter and leave also. I don't see how it makes the code clearer to the reader, by eliminating these ops. I took your example, and eliminated the iter, as follows: Dou iSay; iSay=*On; // Find next memo seq# for member SetGT(E) (CI.Family#:CI.Member#) Mmemo_I; ReadPE(E) (CI.Family#:CI.Member#) Mmemo_I MI; If %Found(Mmemo_I); MO.Mmseq#=MI.Mmseq#+1; Else; MO.Mmseq#=1; EndIf; Monitor; Write Mmorec MO; On-Error *File; iSay=*Off; EndMon; EndDo; Now this is a very simple loop, and doesn't even transcend a page, but in general, while perusing the code, you have to look to the beginning of the loop to determine the condition of the loop. If using iter, you also have to peruse to the top of the loop anyways, so what's the diff? -- "Enter any 11-digit prime number to continue..." -- This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.