RE: Why RPG IV Sucks

["Bob Cozzi" <cozzi@xxxxxxxxx>]

>>Packed VS. Zoned...
Barbara,

But numeric fields won't crash the program if their format is different.
A 7-digit packed field can contain the same value range as a 7-digit zoned
numeric field.

Really, perhaps this should have been "Why Date Fields Suck" because if all
date fields could hold the same date range, then the point would be moot.
But I think we had date fields first so... :)

-Bob


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Barbara Morris
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 8:04 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why RPG IV Sucks

Holden Tommy wrote:
> 
> sounds reasonable that if the date field is defined with a date format
that
> the RPG compiler SHOULD keep the date format...
> 
> maybe a DCR might help???  FWIW, I can generally deal with those type
> scenarios & quirks ok but on a bad day....they frustrate me immensely!!!
> 

This is the same external format vs internal format thing that you get
with fields that are zoned in the database and packed in the program. 
It's behaving that way because RPG allows you to have the fields in
different files with different formats, so it uses a standard default
format for the internal fields.

The best way around it is to define an externally-described data
structure with the fields in the file.  The ext-desc DS will get the
fields exactly the way they are in the file.

For the date thing, you could put DATFMT(*YMD) in the H spec, and then
the dates would default to *YMD instead of *ISO.

-- 
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.