|
On 13/01/2005, at 10:18 AM, Booth Martin wrote:
I have a program that must compile to target release V4R2. It has a process
that needs to be called repeatedly and it is a pig for time. I can
substantially reduce the number of times it is called by saving the result
to an array and checking the array first.
There are two ways to check the array that I am aware of. LOOKUP and
%LOOKUP. The difference in performance appears to be a factor of 10. Is
that to be expected in your opinion? Can LOOKUP take 25 minutes to run, and
%LOOKUP take 4 minutes?
Of course, %LOOKUP won't compile to V4R2 anyway.
So, what say you? How to solve this pig of a performer?
Regards, Simon Coulter. -------------------------------------------------------------------- FlyByNight Software AS/400 Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/ Phone: +61 3 9419 0175 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\ Fax: +61 3 9419 0175 \ / X ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \ --------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.