× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




On 13/01/2005, at 10:18 AM, Booth Martin wrote:

I have a program that must compile to target release V4R2. It has a process
that needs to be called repeatedly and it is a pig for time. I can
substantially reduce the number of times it is called by saving the result
to an array and checking the array first.


There are two ways to check the array that I am aware of. LOOKUP and
%LOOKUP. The difference in performance appears to be a factor of 10. Is
that to be expected in your opinion? Can LOOKUP take 25 minutes to run, and
%LOOKUP take 4 minutes?

LOOKUP is a linear search therefore the elapsed time is a function of the array size and on average will take N/2 lookups to find the search value.


%LOOKUP is a binary search (if the array is sorted) therefore will be much faster over non-trivial data sets and on average will take lg N lookups.

Given a 100 element array LOOKUP will, on average, perform 50 comparisons before finding the search value presuming the search value is in the array. It will perform 100 searches (if the array is not sorted) if the search value is not in the array. %LOOKUP does the same if the array is not sorted but if it is sorted then it will stop after at most 5 comparisons.

Of course, %LOOKUP won't compile to V4R2 anyway.

True, but you could prototype the C bsearch() function and use that all the way back to v3r2 and v3r6.


So, what say you? How to solve this pig of a performer?

Use bsearch() or build the array from the end and control the starting position so you search only populated elements.


Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
   FlyByNight Software         AS/400 Technical Specialists

   http://www.flybynight.com.au/
   Phone: +61 3 9419 0175   Mobile: +61 0411 091 400        /"\
   Fax:   +61 3 9419 0175                                   \ /
                                                             X
                 ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail  / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.