Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
Tony Carolla wrote:
>
> I just started using data structures for file input, output and
> update, for speed reasons (you know I am a speed-freak ;) ), so I am
> curious. Is there any advantage to using an external DS over one
> created with LIKEREC? Also, should we figure that someday, the
> LIKEREC functionality in regards to using for input/output/update,
> will be phased out?
>
There's no speed advantage either way to an external-DS over one created
with LIKEREC.
With an externally-described data structure you can add more subfields,
which can be good if you want to define overlays.
I don't see LIKEREC being phased out. LIKEREC has a mild advantage in
that there's a more obvious relationship between the record format and
the data structure, in the case of renames:
Ffile IF E RENAME(rec : newRec)
D newDsR DS LIKEREC(newRec : *input)
D newDsE E DS EXTNAME(file : rec : *input)
read newRec newDsR;
read newRec newDsE;
I think the relationship between newDsR and newRec is more obvious than
that between newDsE and NewRec.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.