|
I've never experimented, so couldn't tell you about the relative performance. The FETCH RELATIVE does use the ORDER BY sequence and if there are fewer available records than specified, the SQLCOD field should be updated with a non-zero value. Donald R. Fisher, III Project Manager Roomstore Furniture Company (804) 784-7600 extension 2124 DFisher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <clip> AWESOME! Can I presume that a "FETCH RELATIVE -20" is more efficient than doing a "FETCH PRIOR" in a loop 20 times? And, just to clarify, is it RELATIVE to the access path defined by the ORDER BY? (And _not_ by RRN?) What happens if it causes the cursor to hit BOF (or EOF when using RELATIVE +nn)? <clip>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.