× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I've never experimented, so couldn't tell you about the relative
performance.

The FETCH RELATIVE does use the ORDER BY sequence and if there are fewer
available records than specified, the SQLCOD field should be updated with a
non-zero value.

Donald R. Fisher, III
Project Manager
Roomstore Furniture Company
(804) 784-7600 extension 2124
DFisher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


<clip>
AWESOME!  Can I presume that a "FETCH RELATIVE -20" is more efficient than
doing a "FETCH PRIOR" in a loop 20 times?  And, just to clarify, is it
RELATIVE to the access path defined by the ORDER BY? (And _not_ by RRN?)

What happens if it causes the cursor to hit BOF (or EOF when using RELATIVE
+nn)?
<clip>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.