RE: Converting to ILE

Sounds like heresy, but I see your point.

Um, so you could continue to use a corporate wide /copy hspec?

Rob Berendt
-- 
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





"Jon Paris" <Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
10/12/2004 01:37 PM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
<rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Fax to

Subject
RE: Converting to ILE






 >> - a couple RPG op-codes don't work or won't convert (FREE, at least 
one
other)

This is probably the only issue you need be concerned about for now. Since
you intend to convert the code to "true" ILE with subprocs etc. in the
future, why bother with going "ILE" right now?

Don't get me wrong you _should_ convert to RPG IV, but there is little to 
be
gained from compiling as DFTACTGRP(*NO) - simply accept the default of
DFTACTGRP(*YES) and get the benefits of RPG IV without having to be
concerned with OVR scope etc.  Time enough to worry about that when you do
the redesign.

Jon Paris
Partner400
www.Partner400.com


--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.