|
sysdummy1 was often used prior to use of the SET variable statement. Since I've started using that I've not had an occasion to use a dummy file. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v5r3/ic2924/info/db2/rbafzmstsetinto.htm#setinto Maybe, since it is just used by programmers, they should know the rules and key accordingly. Perhaps a second field on the screen might be an optional escape character. Rob Berendt -- Group Dekko Services, LLC Dept 01.073 PO Box 2000 Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com "Dan Bale" <dbale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 10/06/2004 08:53 AM Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To "RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Fax to Subject RE: multiple search arguments in one scan? Thanks to all who have offered suggestions! > c/exec sql > c+ select '1' > c+ into :success_val > c+ from sysibm/sysdummy1 > c+ where :value like '%&%' > c+ or :value like '%+%%' > c+ or :value like '%*%' > c+ or :value like '%+_%' > c+ or :value like '%?%' > c/end-exec Interesting. I've never seen SQL used like this. What is the purpose of sysibm/sysdummy1? Does SQL require a file to "query" even if it's not querying it? Anyway, I can't see where this particular example would offer a performance benefit over pure RPG, but I could be ignorant on this part. At the very least, it could be confusing for someone else who has to modify the application later on. Maybe I should back up a bit and explain what's behind my original post. I am allowing the user to search with wildcards. The data in the search argument itself may contain any typeable character, including the '%' and '_' characters that SQL uses to represent replacement characters. I am letting the user use the more familiar '*' and '?' conventions, and converting them in my program to '%' and '_', respectively. Because of all this, I need to use the ESCAPE expression as well. Potential problems that I haven't figured out how to deal with: Since one of the fields that can be searched is a wide-open text field that allows any typeable characters, how do I allow the user to scan for the occurrence of a '?' or '*'? Maybe I just don't allow it? Typically, these wouldn't be searched for anyways, but I'm just trying to allow for maximum flexibility within the reasonable confines of SQL. One thing I am doing is that I give the user the option to modify the SQL statement my program generates from the prompted information, so if they feel "powerful" enough. (Just so no one panics, the only users of this application are programmers.) So, for example, a user may want to search for 'ABC_XYZ*', which is to say that they are looking for the exact string 'ABC_XYZ' with anything following it. Can anyone confirm that the generated SQL should read: Where CustName Like 'ABC+_XYZ%' ESCAPE '+' tia, db -- This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.