|
Why would it throw it away? Let's presume it's a program bug that you hadn't used a constant and needed it during debug...if thrown away you couldn't use it... you can always to a genopt on a program and look at the MI generated to be sure, but I think it's all kept...kinda like alot of defined but unused function keys, etc.... On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > If I've got a standard include that defines a bunch of constants, based or > not based data structures what happens when most of it is not referenced in > a given program/module? > > I assume the compiler throws away the unused stuff, so you are not wasting > space. > > Can anyone confirm this? Does the behavior depend on debug level or > optimization level? > > Thanks, > Charles > -- > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.