Re: Problem w/SQL

[Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>]

CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Something else along the same line, I've not really used the
> overlay(<...>:*NEXT) myself.  But every example I've seen from Scott and
> Barbara have the first field defined simply overlay(dataDS), then the rest
> defined with the *NEXT.  Don't know if it makes a difference but....
> 

Whenever I notice I've done that, I add *NEXT to the first one too.  I
don't know why I leave it out in the first place, nor do I know why I
think it's important to _have_ it on the first one...

But it doesn't make a difference.  Overlay(name) has an implicit
position of 1; the first overlay(name:*next) also has an implicit
position of 1.