|
Try "typing" PrtOverflow as an indicator. D DS Based(IndicatorPtr) D PrtOverflow 99 99N HTH > > message: 11 > date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:59:27 -0700 > from: CarollaT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > subject: Indicator overlay/rename question > > I have started using the following method for renaming any > indicators I use (which are VERY few). > > D IndicatorPtr S * Inz(%Addr(*In)) > D DS Based(IndicatorPtr) > D PrtOverflow 99 99 > > As you probably already know, this allows me to use the > PrtOverflow in my code instead of the vague *In99. > Beautiful. But now, in my calc specs, in testing the > indicator for 'on'-ness, I can't do the following: > > If PrtOverflow; > Write Header; > PrtOverflow=*Off; > EndIf; > > This works if I use *In99 instead of PrtOverflow. The first > line of that statement brings up the following error: > > *RNF7423 30 000133 A relational expression or indicator is > expected for logical operations > > I have to change the first line to > > If PrtOverflow=*On; > > I have been told by a good friend of mine that the statement > is basically asking, 'If it's true that it's true'. Is there > a way I can change the technique to allow the first 'if' statement? > > Tony Carolla > MedAmerica Billing Services, Inc. > > > ------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.