|
My company recently upgraded their software and my boss wants me to "review all the files for changes". Don't ask why I can't just ask the real programmers - long story. Anyway, I have a library with the current files and a library with the old files. I also have a file that contains the names of all of our files (and a logical over that for just the physical files). So I thought I would just read my file with the physical file names and chain to the QADBXREF to figure out the number of fields and/or the record length. The key to QADBXREF is the library name and the file name. I would just chain to QADBXREF with the old library/file name and then chain with the new library/file name and if there was a difference in the record length/number of fields there would be a good chance that the file had been changed. So I do my chain to QADBXREF and I don't get a hit. I know the key is correct. And I know the record exists in the QADBXREF file. Is there something special about QADBXREF? Thanks DT
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.