|
Rob Berendt Wrote: I don't think you can dimension a 'traditional' array that way. There are other arrays, playing tricks with %alloc or some such animal. However, I get the impression that is one feature the compiler developers wish they could take back. Do you even need to look at the detail information? I take it this isn't some simple report or you wouldn't even need arrays, just print at control break time. Would a SQL GROUP BY with a fetch loop work? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the reply. This is not for a report, it is for a data extract. And the file is keyed by date, to avoid reading through the entire 13mil records. I don't want to resort to "trickery"... I will look into this %alloc animal though, because I would use some well-documented, reliably built "trickery", for this case. Using SQL would work, except for I don't have the Licensed Goods, so I would have to resort to using Call Level Interface, which seems to be a lot of extra coding for the desired result. Tony Carolla MedAmerica Billing Services, Inc.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.