|
>> Yes, it will work, but I doubt that it will change SQL's >> opinion about "too many host variables". Oopppsss I will not respond without reading _all_ of the example code - I will not respond without reading _all_ of the example code - I will not respond without reading _all_ ...... Actually courtesy of V5R1's qualified data names etc, this can still be achieved. The DS I described can be simply BASED on the address of the original DS that is filled by SQL. For that matter the original code (minus the nasty from/to of course <grin>) would work as well. With luck we'll get some relief from a bit of this mess in V5R3 when the pre-processor steps up a notch. Rob? Any idea if this particular issue is resolved in V5R3? Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
