|
| -----Original Message----- | [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces+jt=ee.net@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of M. Lazarus | Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 1:38 PM | Unfortunately, IBM | chose this implementation, so the easiest is the use SETLL/READE, so the | I/O opcodes are compatible. | | -mark Well, unfortunately IBM does not do one single bit of RPG application development, I would add. So they would not appreciate the advantages of NOT using a SETLL/READE, not one single bit. Unless this list brought it to their attention, and this list is more interested in turning RPG into a clone of C and/or Java, unfortunately. Jon Paris and I exchanged views on this subject over on M-L last year, and the fact of the matter remains that this list is a subset of <1000 people with a given orientation. And, again unfortunately, there are (according to figures from Mr. Zollar) roughly 299,000 RPGers that have a largely different orientation than becoming C and Java gearheads. Tough set of unintended consequences, that one.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.