|
I completely agree on this point, and stopped using blank-after around 1979 or 80 for that very reason. (I mention this, partially because, no, I do NOT just believe that Everything old is good, a-TALL.) And this would be the essence of the conundrum many face in the computer industry today, because they haven't YET learnt that putting calcs in browser-code is poor programming practice. (Putting a widget in a browser being completely different.) Not to mention the security risks that Necessarily go along. | -----Original Message----- | [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of M. Lazarus | Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:04 PM | Although it's technically correct to use the "blank after" | feature, it's | not very intuitive for someone who is not familiar w/ the program. This | about it - "O" specs are for output, yet you're putting a calc in there! | | I have long since stopped using them. | | -mark
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.