|
Scott Klement wrote: > > Hi Joep, > > > > > But while we're at it: I think it is silly you have to use a based data > > structure with a dummy pointer for a template. Why not 'TEMPLATE' in > > stead of 'BASED(@)'? > > > I usually use: > > D PURCH_CONF DS based(prototype_only) I don't know what came over me to use @; using @ in source files can cause problems if the file is restored with the wrong CCSID. I usually use something like BASED(typedef_dummy). I agree that TEMPLATE would be nice.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.