Re: BLOCK(*YES) questions

Yes, the file is defined as keyed.  To clarify the example scenario, let me
add that RRN 950 in my sample file has key 'AC'.  You are suggesting that the
block of records as shown in RRN order in my original post would appear to the
program in a block that looks like this:

RRN  Key
  1   AA
  7   AB
950   AC
  4   BH
  3   EG
  5   WY
  6   WZ
  2   ZZ

Did I read your statement correctly?  Does IBM clarify this at all?  If I
wanted to test this, would an RPG DUMP show the number of blocks read, or
would I see it somewher in the file's INFDS?

--- Steve Landess <sjl_123@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you have the file defined as Keyed, as shown in your 'F' spec, the block
> of records will be in key order.  Otherwise, AFAIK, they will be in RRN
> order.
> 
> Steve
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dan" <dbcerpg@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:38 AM
> Subject: BLOCK(*YES) questions
> 
> 
> > BLOCK(*YES) questions:
> >
> >      FCMMASTER  IF   E           K DISK    block(*yes)
> >
> > Does BLOCK(*YES) bring in a block of records in sequential order from the
> > file, or in keyed order?
> >
> > RRN  Key
> >   1   AA
> >   2   ZZ
> >   3   EG
> >   4   BH
> >   5   WY
> >   6   WZ
> >   7   AB
> >
> > In this scenario, will the block of records be in RRN sequence or in keyed
> > sequence?
> >
> > RPG documentation is not, IMO, not very helpful in indicating how blocking
> > occurs.
> >
> > The archives has a post that appears to support a block "by keyed
> records":
> >
> > http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/200212/msg00433.html
> > > 2. Blocking is done is in sequence that the records are being accessed:
> > > keyed or arrival.  NBRRCDS is always done in arrival sequence.  That's
> why
> > > the warning.
> >
> > I have found several posts that imply that blocking is by physical
> sequence.
> > But nothing that says this.
> >
> > Is there an IBM reference to this?
> >
> > TIA,
> > Dan


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools