|
rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > ... > When they added the 1 byte support I wonder if the lack of a 1b field was > either: > A) Because of a desire to get people to go to the more robust integer > B) Code that was automatically converted from 1 byte to 2 bytes under the > covers might break if they left it as 1 byte. > Both, but mainly B)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
