Re: Duplicate defs in subprocedures -- RPG400-L

I normally place reusable subprocedures in a separate module or service
program. This one happens just to be called in a total section of the
cycle. (Yea, I still use the cycle).  I've gotten into the habit of not
coding subroutines anymore but coding subprocedures instead. Just for the
reason of local variables and things like that.

Thanks,

Mark

Mark D. Walter
Senior Programmer/Analyst
CCX, Inc.
mwalter@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ccxinc.com


|---------+----------------------------->
|         |           rob@xxxxxxxxx     |
|         |           Sent by:          |
|         |           rpg400-l-bounces@m|
|         |           idrange.com       |
|         |                             |
|         |                             |
|         |           01/30/2004 03:09  |
|         |           PM                |
|         |           Please respond to |
|         |           RPG programming on|
|         |           the AS400 /       |
|         |           iSeries           |
|         |                             |
|---------+----------------------------->
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                             
                                                 |
  |       To:       RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries 
<rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>                                               |
  |       cc:                                                                   
                                                 |
  |       Subject:  Re: Duplicate defs in subprocedures                         
                                                 |
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




And glad you got it figured out.  By the way, there's nothing wrong with
subprocedures in your main module.  Not only is that good for all the
benefits of subprocedures, but it gives you a growth path to decide if the
code is reusable enough to be moved out to a service program.  If you
choose to go that way.

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





MWalter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/30/2004 02:00 PM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Fax to

Subject
Re: Duplicate defs in subprocedures







Nevermind, I had the stupid thing defined twice in the same sub-procedure.
TGIF! ! !

Thanks,

Mark

Mark D. Walter
Senior Programmer/Analyst
CCX, Inc.
mwalter@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ccxinc.com


|---------+----------------------------->
|         |           MWalter@hanoverwir|
|         |           e.com             |
|         |           Sent by:          |
|         |           rpg400-l-bounces@m|
|         |           idrange.com       |
|         |                             |
|         |                             |
|         |           01/30/2004 01:55  |
|         |           PM                |
|         |           Please respond to |
|         |           RPG programming on|
|         |           the AS400 /       |
|         |           iSeries           |
|         |                             |
|---------+----------------------------->

>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  |                                                       |
  |       To:       rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx                       |
  |       cc:                                                       |
  |       Subject:  Duplicate defs in subprocedures            |

>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





Hello all,

I thought one of the beauties of sub-procedures was to be able to define
local variables? I have two subprocedures in my main module. I know,
that's
not good but they are subprocedures that process level breaks. So I
defined
a variable, 'idx', in each of two subprocedures and the compile fails. I
thought I've done this before. Does this rule only come into play if
NOMAIN
is specified.

Thanks,

Mark

Mark D. Walter
Senior Programmer/Analyst
CCX, Inc.
mwalter@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ccxinc.com


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.






_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.