Re: Statically binding multiple MAIN modules with display files

[Scott Mildenberger <scottmildenberger@xxxxxxxxx>]

Joe,

This is a place where I still use dynamic CALLs.  I really don't
like bind by copy which is probably the way these would get
bound unless you put them into a service program which doesn't
make sense to me.  By using a dynamic CALL the programs exist as
*PGM objects and in some cases they are a menu option and called
as an option from some other program.

Just the opinion of a furniture salesman,

Scott Mildenberger

--- Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> General question:
> 
> Is there a good reason to bind together multiple application
> programs
> each with their own display files, or is the recommendation
> still to use
> dynamic CALLs?
> 
> What are the pros and cons of binding multiple programs
> together that
> have their own display files?  It seems to me that this is a
> place where
> the dynamic CALL still makes sense.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus