× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> From: Steve Richter
> 
> In such a setting, .NET and the
> iSeries is far superior to java and the iSeries.

If .NET had an equivalent package to IBM's Java Toolbox, you might be
able to say .NET has similar capabilites.  But the toolbox allows a
greater interaction between a JVM and the iSeries than any other
technique.  Add to that the fact that any code you write in Java can
then be used as a component in a web application running servlets and
JavaServer Pages, and Java is still a better bang for the buck.  Throw
in WDSci and the WebSphere Test Environment, and Microsoft still has a
little way to go as far as a development framework.

On the other hand, given the large amount of VB knowledge out there,
thick client applications have a leg up in the .NET environment.
However, as far as I've been able to tell over the last few years, thick
client development is losing mindshare to browser-based applications.

So my position right now is that for web applications, the JVM is still
the place to be, while if you're developing a Windows thick client, .NET
has a lot to offer.

Joe


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.