Re: QRCVDTAQ vs Varying length fields

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

Thanks.  I figured this out quick when I tried to use a different size.

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 




Scott Klement <klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
11/26/2003 02:09 PM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Fax to

Subject
Re: QRCVDTAQ vs Varying length fields






On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> So should I change my prototype from
> > D  DataRead                  32702A   OPTIONS(*VARSIZE) VARYING
> to
> > D  DataRead                  32702A
>

Actually, I'd keep the OPTIONS(*VARSIZE) but just remove the "VARYING."
Especially if this is a prototype you'll have in a /copy member.  You
don't want to force every user to declare his data queues with 32702-long
records...


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.