|
> From: Bartell, Aaron L. (TC) > > Not that I want to start another crazy thread about /Free, but these > comments usually come from people that haven't used it enough. Even Joe > Pluta recently agreed that /Free format is a good thing after many many > disagreeing posts. Careful, Aaron. My statement was that I like the flexibility of /free, and that I have learned to code around the lack of a MOVE opcode. I still think the lack of a MOVE opcode or BIF is still an unjustifiable wart on what could be an otherwise useful syntax. I use /free for new development. It's great in WDSC, where you can see a nice 60x80 rectangle, which is plenty of room for all but the most complex procedures. And even so, I still run into places where I wish I had the MOVE opcode, and like Colin, I find it a pain to have to workaround this artificial limitation - a limitation imposed by fiat by the compiler team. So, my position hasn't really changed. /free is good for new development, but it sucks for legacy systems solely because of the lack of a MOVE. Oh, and I hate the semi-colons <grin>. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.