|
I am curious if i am alone on my thoughts about unique keys. If there is a very loud silence we will know that unique keys is the answer. Is there other ways to have various addresses without using defined record types as part of the key. *vbg* (I have no delusions abut my weird ideas.) --------------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin http://www.MartinVT.com Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------- -------Original Message------- From: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Date: 11/17/03 14:12:28 To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries' Subject: RE: the idea of unique primary keys to be a solution that hasoutlived its usefulness? In this case, I would have a separate file for addresses and use a type to differentiate them. We are, in fact, getting ready to develop a new customer tracking database using a similar model. Donald R. Fisher, III Project Manager Roomstore Furniture Company (804) 784-7600 extension 2124 DFisher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.