Re: Function Opinion -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Function Opinion
From: Brian Parkins <PARKIB@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:42:39 +0100
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sensitivity:




I have a client that insists on creating service programs with only one
function per service program.  I have always been of the opinion that all
"like" functions should be contained in a service program together.

>> I agree with you.

That being said, are there any benefits or possible issues with having only
one function per service program?>

>> Keeps someone in employment, managing all of the objects <grin>!!

Brian Parkins.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Function Opinion , Bob cozzi

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.