× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Dunno much about C++, but comment I "heard" was one should DESIGN by
"thinking in C++" but implement in C.  Sounds similar to John Sears advice
on RDB I saw 20 years ago:  Design to 5th-normal-form, but implement in 3rd
or 4th.

YMMV

| -----Original Message-----
| From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Hans Boldt
| Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 8:21 AM
| To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| Subject: Re: calling c++ class member function from rpg
|
|
| Steve Richter wrote:
|
| > the great one would never talk like that!
| > ...
|
| Well, duh!  Of course it's a parody. But as with some, it had a ring
| of truth to it. C++ is not a terribly easy language to learn or use.
| And although it does have a place in the realm of systems
| programming, why anyone would willingly choose it to do any
| applications programming is totally beyond me.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.