|
Dunno much about C++, but comment I "heard" was one should DESIGN by "thinking in C++" but implement in C. Sounds similar to John Sears advice on RDB I saw 20 years ago: Design to 5th-normal-form, but implement in 3rd or 4th. YMMV | -----Original Message----- | From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx | [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Hans Boldt | Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 8:21 AM | To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Subject: Re: calling c++ class member function from rpg | | | Steve Richter wrote: | | > the great one would never talk like that! | > ... | | Well, duh! Of course it's a parody. But as with some, it had a ring | of truth to it. C++ is not a terribly easy language to learn or use. | And although it does have a place in the realm of systems | programming, why anyone would willingly choose it to do any | applications programming is totally beyond me.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.