|
> > I can't speak to the efficiency question, but from a maintenance > > programmer's point of view, I much rather see the EXCEPT over the UPDATE. > > The intent of the code is VERY clear with the EXCEPT. > > Why do you think %fields() is less clear? I wasn't thinking about %fields(); just the raw UPDATE vs. an EXCEPT with O-specs naming the specific fields to be updated. I think %fields() would be nicer than the O-specs because one can see the intent even clearer than having to bounce down to the O-specs. I can't use %fields() yet because not all of my customers are that recent in OS/400 release level. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.