RE: SQL vs native access

>From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Do you have any type of formal information on this.

Look at http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/pdfs/sg246598.pdf,
specifically figure 2-2 on page 12. 

>or are you just guessing?

Guessing, no. Do I have a complete understanding of the 5.2 changes, NO! I'm
just beginning to comprehend the red piece above.

-Walden

------------
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:20 PM
To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: RE: SQL vs native access 


> From: Walden H. Leverich III
> 
> I think that was true prior to 5.2. In <=5.1 SQL actually accessed
data
> through the same SLIC primatives as single record operations. However,
in
> 5.2 SQL has a new query engine (below the MI) and its own set of SLIC
> primatives so I'm tempted to say that common sense may see a change.

According to Jon Paris' post, this doesn't seem to be the case, Walden.
Do you have any type of formal information on this, or are you just
guessing?

Joe

_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.