× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



My personal preference is to use file names.

Scott Mildenberger

--- Joe Giusto <jgiusto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I understand the need to read format names when you have
> multiple record
> formats in a file and only want one or the other, but what if
> any advantages
> are there to always reading record format names.  IMHO it is
> more confusing
> to have a program full of reads to format names as they can
> vary so much
> from the file names (in our case I am referring to logicals
> here).  And why
> do we need to always write to record format names instead of
> file names even
> when there is only one record format in the file?
> 
> I would be interested to see what others are doing (reading
> formats or file
> names) and opinions on this which is better.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.