× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> I have a situation where i have a page at a time subfile.  Page = size.
> A request has come in that will require a SFLFOLD/SFLDROP.  It appears
> that i cannot do this.

Why not?  I wouldn't think the system would care if the subfile was page
at a time or not?   I mean there isn't really a difference between loading
a subfile where there just happens to be only 10 records to display, and
loading a subfile where you're only loading 10 records, then clearing it,
and loading another 10...   At least, the system doesn't know there's a
difference!

So, you should be able to do SFLFOLD just as you would otherwise, aside
from the obvious fact, of course, that there'll be fewer records displayed
at a time...

> Does anyone know different and if so, how is this accomplished without
> changing to an expanding subfile.  This subfile contains more than 9999
> records.

Alternately, you could just code two different subfiles, and switch
between them when the fold/drop function key is pressed.  That's easy to
do, and should accomplish your goal...


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.