|
Qouting myself.... > How do i interpret this ? Is VALUE related to this > optimization ? Wouldn't > be another way to call procedures with parameters defined as > CONST or passed > by reference ? I've already tried prototyping the three params as (*), setting 2 in the parameters format array (to specify pointer, becouse that's what a procedure expects in this case). The api is caller and no error is returned, but the value recieved is incorrect (garbage). Carlos K.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.