|
Hi Rick, FWIW, %lookup has a 4th parm -- number of elements to search. In other words, load 100 elements of a 1000-element array and do x = %lookup(SearchFor: Array: StartElem: #ElemToSearch) With a binary search, I'm not sure there'd be a significant increase in performance. hth, Peter Dow Dow Software Services, Inc. 909 793-9050 voice 909 793-4480 fax 909 522-3214 cell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard B Baird" > is there an appreciable difference between that and back filling my array > with hivals and starting at the beginning? > > for example (on a much smaller scale - my array is set at 9999 with a > possibility of more than a 1000 valid iters, in otherwords, about 1/10th > full.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.