|
Hi Rick,
FWIW, %lookup has a 4th parm -- number of elements to search. In other
words, load 100 elements of a 1000-element array and do
x = %lookup(SearchFor: Array: StartElem: #ElemToSearch)
With a binary search, I'm not sure there'd be a significant increase in
performance.
hth,
Peter Dow
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 793-9050 voice
909 793-4480 fax
909 522-3214 cell
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard B Baird"
> is there an appreciable difference between that and back filling my array
> with hivals and starting at the beginning?
>
> for example (on a much smaller scale - my array is set at 9999 with a
> possibility of more than a 1000 valid iters, in otherwords, about 1/10th
> full.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.