|
Steve, >>>I dont. ... /free was a bit step >>>forward because it added a lot of procedure call features to the mix while >>>retaining the OS related stuff. >No, I meant what I said. with /free you have a lot more room to operate How does that equate to "it added a lot of procedure call features to the mix"? > Longer, more >descriptive procedure names, qualified data structure field names, nested >procedures. All of which are available without using /free too. So again, just how did this add "a lot of procedure call features to the mix"? I'll be the first to rally the cause of finally getting /free -- I was one of the proponents for it to be the base syntax for RPG IV -- but I don't see the connection to adding procedure call features. We've had longer procedure names since what, V3R7? Nested procedure names since V3R2/V3R6. And qualified data structure field names are not limited to /free either. Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
