|
> From: Walden H. Leverich III > > I must disagree on two points. First, some members on this list have, > obvious, input into the direction and capabilities of RPG, and to > that end a > conversation about the possible capabilities of the language are important > and topical. Afterall, if we don't express our desires and leave > it to Hans > we'll all be coding free-form RPG that looks like Python <G> The problem here is that general discussions of OO inevitably turn into philosophical discussions which, IMO, are better left to another list. Maybe you can create an "RPG futures" list, or a "language architecture" list, both of which would welcome these sorts of discussions comparing C++ and Java. But this is not the list for those discussions. My opinion.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
