RE: external subprocedures setting on LR: performance impact?

["Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Buck Calabro
>
> Once more, foot into my mouth!  For what it's worth, in my opinion, using
> subprocedures this way is not a good way to design an application.  I
> believe the intended use of subprocedures is to do ONE SIMPLE thing, and
> that it should know NOTHING about global variables.  Some think
> me Utopian,
> but why make a subprocedure if the guts are basically a complete
> program?  I
> mean, why not just leave it as a program?

I think this depends on what the program does.  If the files are closely
related and the program is doing a single business function (updating a
customer order, for example), then I think this is perfectly fine.

In the most perfect of worlds, I'd rather see one and only one module access
any given file, and that module be called by everyone else.  Each module
would access only a single file or a set of file with direct parent/child
relationships, such as order header and order detail.  If one program than
had to access another file, it would do it through a call to that file's I/O
module.

Joe