|
Aaron and Booth, (and later Rob) I'm kind of in the middle of this arguement. I 'learned' VB a few years back (for the second time) by doing a small project that no one else wanted to do. I had been through the 'in 21 days routine' a year or so before that, so I had a bit of a head start. the project took me about 4 times as long as it should have, the code was sloppy and not especially efficient, but the ap worked. if i would have had the opportunity to start another VB project right away, I feel confident that I would have improved my skills exponentially, and with maybe 3 or 4 comparable projects under my belt, i think i would have gotten pretty darned good at it. But alas, I didn't get that next one, and I am now just as confident that if I were given another to write today, i would be back at square 1 - just good enough to write a helloworld. And I could tell the exact same story with lotus notes/domino. Use it or lose it. That's why I am not especially eager to tackle a new language at this point. There isn't a demand for me to learn those skills, I don't get the same satisfaction (at this point anyway) coding in those languages as I do with RPG. It isn't a lack of ambition. It's a lack of ROI. I spent a lot of time on VB and Notes, and didn't retain enough of those skills to have made it worth my while. If I were being asked 'we are a little slow now, so why don't you start learning java, so we can do this and that... ', I would jump at the chance. and, Rob, I do try to keep up with the new release stuff, as much as is practical. some of it I use right away, others I think 'that would be cool next time i need to do something like that' and the rest, I file away in the 'probably won't have a use for that anytime soon' category. I'm currently working in a consultant/contractor capacity. my day is filled with things on my plate that I SHOULD ALREADY KNOW. My current client will not stand for paying my hourly rate to learn a new language. And i won't get good enough at one by doing hello worlds on weekends. call me lazy if you want. i've got other stuff i'd rather do. Rick ---original message: booth and aaron----- >Your comment about lack of ambition is just to insulting to respond to. That is the only reason I have seen for people not learning when they are perfectly capable. They get comfortable where they are at and stop there. If somebody wants to maintain RPG programs the rest of their life, more power to them, but when they say they would love to learn something new but don't, then that is lack of ambition. >It takes at least 3 years of intensive and hard work with plenty of experience. I don't know where you are getting your numbers, but they seem a little extensive. I don't want to get into an argument on this, but it should NOT take 3 years to get a productive RPG programmer. >... but to be a worthwhile programmer in the business environment in less then 3 years does not happen anywhere but in the mind of the self-important. Well thanks for the compliment:-) Aaron Bartell ------and rob berent added later------- The person who complained about people not learning is probably speaking from experience. There are people who keep up on magazines, attend user group meetings, study the "What's new in this release", and still meet deadlines for objectives, and have a happy home life. Then there are those who generate excuses. And both groups may be found in the same shop. Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.