RE: Passing Multi-Occurence Data Structures -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Passing Multi-Occurence Data Structures
From: Buck Calabro <Buck.Calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 08:34:35 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

It's an interesting design question.  If you pass a pointer to a global
MODS, then in reality you can simply omit the pointer and have the
subprocedure directly manipulate the MODS.  On the other hand, having a
pointer in the parameter list shows your intent to use the data structure in
the subprocedure.  I think I would pass the pointer.

  --buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.