RE: Binder Language and Procedure Interface -- RPG400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Binder Language and Procedure Interface
From: Scott Mildenberger <Smildenber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 08:14:29 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

No, the number of parameters is not part of the service program signature.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth.D.Shields@blum.com [mailto:Seth.D.Shields@blum.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:14 AM
> To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
> Subject: Binder Language and Procedure Interface
>
>
> If I add a *nopass parameter to a Procedure Interface in a
> Service Program, do I need to add a PgmLvl(*prv) to the
> binder language
> to prevent level check issues with programs that don't get recompiled?
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.