|
I am going to do that now. I thought I was limited to 15 or so characters when what I really needed was at least 20. It doesn't look like that will be a problem anymore. I don't know how I missed that when the new release came out??? Thanks for the example Bob, Aaron Bartell -----Original Message----- From: Jim Langston [mailto:jlangston@celsinc.com] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:57 PM To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com' Subject: RE: Qualified sub-procedures I've seen this question a lot, and have always wondered, why not just qualify the name yourself when you name it until it's put in the compiler? MyLibrary.MyFunction MyOtherLibrary.MyOtherFunction MyThirdLibrary.MyThirdFunction if it doesn't accept . in a function name, try -, or # or whatever. I understand this is a kludge, and is a sloppy work around, but it would work. It would prevent, however, using the simple name MyFunction, it would always have to be "qualified". Regards, Jim Langston -----Original Message----- From: Bartell, Aaron L. (TC) [mailto:ALBartell@taylorcorp.com] IBM'ers I know this has been asked before awhile ago, but what is the outlook on getting qualified subprocedure names? The corporation I work for is currently re-writing a vast majority of their software and ILE is going to be used heavily. This is a big concern for us because we want to try and leverage ILE as much as possible but this has come up as a major road block. We are now trying to find ways to make our sub-procudures unique in 15 spaces (I think that's how many there are in V5R1) but still make them understandable and that is next to impossible when designing a large system. We have too much knowledge invested in RPG to use a language more suited to OO design so switching is for the most part out of the question. (even though I wouldn't mind;-) I put this on my RPG voting ballot as a requested enhancement and feel that it is a necessity vs. something that should even be voted on. What is the outlook on something like this? How many others would like this same enhancement? I can't wait for overloading!!!! (assuming it made the cut;-) _______________________________________________ This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.