|
> From: Scott Klement > > It shouldn't take an expert like Jon to explain why BINARY(4) is different > from 4B... it has, after all, been discussed here *MANY* times before. I didn't ask why the 4B and BINARY(4) were different, Scott. What I asked was why a 4B field is the same size as a 5I field, but not the same size as a 5B field, which is even more confusing than the 4B/BINARY(4) mismatch. You've alluded to the fact that it has to do with decimal precision. A 5I field can hold any decimal representation of a two-byte binary field, which can in turn hold any four-digit decimal number (4B). I think I understand it, but it's not particularly intuitive. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.