× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> From: Scott Klement
>
> It shouldn't take an expert like Jon to explain why BINARY(4) is different
> from 4B...  it has, after all, been discussed here *MANY* times before.

I didn't ask why the 4B and BINARY(4) were different, Scott.

What I asked was why a 4B field is the same size as a 5I field, but not the
same size as a 5B field, which is even more confusing than the 4B/BINARY(4)
mismatch.  You've alluded to the fact that it has to do with decimal
precision.  A 5I field can hold any decimal representation of a two-byte
binary field, which can in turn hold any four-digit decimal number (4B).

I think I understand it, but it's not particularly intuitive.

Joe



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.