× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I do not believe that you can use %found, to get the status of the chain,
after you've done the read.  Because %found, or even %found(filename) will
only return the status of the last file operation.

However, (not that it isn't out there) but I've not seen a reason I would
care about the status of the chain after I've already done other file
operations.
chain K1 filename;
dow %found(filename);
  // some stuff here
  reade K1 filename;
enddo;

Why would you care?  To see if you had any hits at all?  Then maybe:
chain K1 filename;
if %found(filename);
  dow %found(filename);
    // some stuff here
    reade K1 filename;
  enddo;
else;
  // no hits
endif;


Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin




"Srinath R , Gurgaon" <srinathr@ggn.hcltech.com>
Sent by: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com
09/03/2002 04:37 AM
Please respond to rpg400-l


        To:     rpg400-l@midrange.com
        cc:
        Fax to:
        Subject:        Built-in functions.


Hi,

I would like to know , are the built-in functions like (%Found,%EOF...)
specific to file operations.
I mean %Found to be used only for Chain and %EOF for Read/Reade...and like
that.
Now If I am having a Chain operation followed by a Setll and reade and If
I
am checking for %Found,
It will be successful even-though the record may not have been found (the
high indicator is seton for Chain and Equal indicator for reade).
Considering this scenario can anyone please help me to come to a
conclusion,
why %Found should be successful.


C     K1            CHAIN     TESTPF                             05
C     K1            SETLL     TESTPF                               20
C     K1            READE     TESTPF                                 10
C                   IF        %FOUND

Can I use %Found for the chain opcode after Reade. If so, how to go about
the same. Or should I revert back to usage of indicators.
Please feel free to contact, in case I am not clear about the above
mentioned problem.

Regards
Srinath

_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.