LVLCHK(*NO) -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: LVLCHK(*NO)
From: J Michael Smith <JMichael.Smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:21:47 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

After reviewing the archives, I find that most would not recommend using
LVLCHK(*NO).

With that as a given, we are considering adding two alpha(3 position fields)
to a master file.  There are no changes of any kind to the previous "fields"
and the new fields will be added a the end of the DDS.

Can someone tell me why using LVLCHK(*NO) would the a bad thing to do in
this situation.

Michael Smith

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: LVLCHK(*NO) , Alan Cassidy

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.