|
Barbara Morris wrote: > Pardon me for jumping in, but we already know that most of the items are > desirable to most people. So we want to know what you want most. I'm > glad that we managed to set the prices in a way that is forcing you to > choose. You say that you want to know what people want most but if nobody picked an $80 item, does that mean nobody wanted that or that it was just too darn expensive? I think everyone on this list, as programmers,understand need to weight these items according to the degree of difficulty in implementing them. I just think if you really want know what we want most, it would make more since to have us rank the items and you apply your weighting those results. What ever your method, we do appreciate being asked. Seth Shields Julius Blum Inc.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.