|
Hans, do you really think that some of these enhancements are truly eighty dollar enhancements, based on the amount of work? Believe me, I'm in no way saying what it should be - we've established that I'm no compiler guru, and I absolutely defer to your expertise in this. I'm just wondering if it's really, say, twice as hard to do procedure overloading as it is SPECIAL file support? Because with $80 options, I'm stuck with one real selection and then one or two little ones. In my case, I'd like the EVALC keyword. Combined with procedure overloads, and I'm done with my ballot. I'm wondering if you might not want to either lower the cost of items or give us a slightly bigger budget in order to allow a little more flexibility? I understand limiting choices to get people to pick what they really want, but limiting us to just two or three enhancements seems a bit drastic. I'm going to send this comment to George as well, but I wonder what other people think. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.