|
Hi, What makes the "record manager" so much smarter under ILE? I've seen this error a few times on programs converted to ILE, but ran OK in RPG400. RPGIV / ILE / whatever seems to be a lot "smarter" about this than OPM did. I'm just wondering why. This kind of thing is an argument used against converting to RPGIV / ILE. This seems as though it would be a function of the "record manager", not the "environment". Is this somehow caused by the new&improved activation group? My latest example showing this problem is: C kholdk Chain qlvf020d C If %found(qlvf020d) And @lotohqty > *Zero C Eval lbqoh = lbqoh + @lotohqty C Update ql020d C Else **** this goes and chains the same record, generating the error I added an UnLock(E) following the else. Really should split the If, but the unlock was quicker. I realize this is a legitimate problem, but RPG400 (OPM) didn't care. This seems to be more of a "midrange-l" question, but after I added a little RPG code, I changed to rpg400-l. TIA AS/Resources, Inc. William A.(Tony) Corbett IBM Certified Specialist - AS/400 Developer http://www.asresources.com corbett@asresources.com 770-587-4812 (office) 678-935-5006 (mobile) fax: 404-663-4737
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.