|
At 5/14/02 09:36 AM, you wrote: >DDS keyword FIFO requires that you not reuse deleted records. Typically, >it is a very bad idea to create files without the attribute set to allow >the system to reuse deleted records. I was pretty sure that that was the case. >Even in a case where you might determine that it is okay to not allow >the system to reuse deleted records today, tomorrow might be a different >story. In such a case, you would be facing a problem because the key >structure doesn't suffice. If you are explicitly putting the FIFO keyword in the source, then that is a deliberate design decision and should be respected as such. There's no right or wrong there. >And what happens to the arrival sequence path if you copy the file or >reorganize it over the key fields? I'm not sure, since I haven't had a need to try this. Would FIFO sequencing be retained? -mark
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.